STUDY TOUR OF COMILLA
AND OTHER AREAS IN BANGLADESH

14 March - 29 March 1981

 

NESTOR M. PESTELOS

Project Compassion

Philippines

31 March 1981

Bangladesh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART I: SUMMARY

A.      Issues

    1. Comilla Model

 

The Comilla Model is essentially a multi-pronged strategy to increase agricultural

production.

Cooperatives are formed to draw thrift savings from the  people; institute a built-in mechanism for repayment of loans; and serve as delivery network for services and commodities from government, banks and other sources of external assistance.

An institutional framework is established at local level which affects coordination among government agencies and other entities as well as provide cooperative access to rural credit, seeds and fertilizers, modern techniques, and other inputs required in production.

Drainage canals, mechanized irrigation, and roads are built in the rural areas as infrastructure for agricultural development.

 

    1. Replication of the Model

 

Thru the Integrated Rural Development Program (IRDP), the government has taken the model outside the laboratory area for replication throughout the country.

Generally, the emphasis is placed in one component, the formation of cooperatives.  Replicating the total package requires heavy investments beyond the current capability of the government to provide.

It is also assumes a degree of commitment and technical expertise available at government level which are basic preconditions in institution-building and organizational work among the people.

The assumption seems to have been a little optimistic.

 

    1. Role of the Academy

 

The failure of previous rural development approaches led to the established of the Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development in 1959.

Its continuing work at Comilla have yielded innovative strategies in various aspects of rural development work.

The Academy has admirably survived political changes, the retirement of its “great teacher,” Dr. Ahmed Ackter Khan, the barrage of criticisms unleashed on the institution from virtually all encampments.

Its staff continue to perform tasks that they used to while evolving the Comilla approach:  organizing people, motivating groups, testing approaches, documenting experience, evaluating trends, refining techniques – doing development in the usual spirit of high adventure and on-the-ground pragmatism. 

How to imbue implementers with such spirit (and the skills) without virtually duplicating the Academy physically at every Thana seems to be the problem.  Is the role of the Academy also replicable outside the laboratory area?

The world awaits the answer.

 

    1. Main Trend in Development Efforts

 

While the country’s landscape is pockmarked with ponds, the social geography is dotted with pilot projects, each seeking and elusive answer to the riddle of underdevelopment.  Some 53 international organizations operate in the country.  There are few indigenous ones.

Ironically, the perceived deficiencies, if not outright failure, of the Comilla model seem to propel many others to try new approaches, evolve strategies.  It’s the old 1953 story all over again – with the Academy on the defensive this time.

However they may differ in approaches and strategies, these projects almost always end up granting loans, and supporting income-generating activities.  Income generation is the main trend in Bangladesh today.

As always as it was when the Academy emerged from among the palm trees of Comilla 21 years ago.

 

B.      Lessons of Possible Value to Ilaw ng Buhay

 

    1. On Replicability

 

a.       In correct to the Comilla approach, the Ilaw ng Buhay is not a program strategy for agricultural development.

 

It is a process model.

 

Increased agricultural production may come about as a result, but the process does not emanate from a particular sectoral framework, such as for instance, agriculture, health, industry, education, social services.

 

Rather the Ilaw process stems from the advocacy that community-government collaboration in development in possible; that such collaboration can be catalyzed at each phase of a project cycle, from planning to evaluation; that the sequencing of activities to bring about each phase can in fact be planned, implemented, and assessed.

 

It is this sequencing which is being refined in varied situations by the project organization.

 

b.       In applying the process model in varying circumstances, the project organization has evolved strategies relating to particular developmental issues, which are to name a few critical ones:  community survey with findings used to forge agreement on priority problems which can be tackled by all sectors; how to motivate and sustain the interests of each participant group; the family at risk, the child in need, the environment in danger, etc. as rallying point for community action; local-level planning; community participation in project formulation, monitoring, and assessment.

 

c.       The efficacy of the process model in forging close community-government is what we want to demonstrate to policymakers, planners, and implementers.

 

d.       Can such proess be replicated by government or any project genuinely seeking the participation of communities in developmental efforts?  Strategically, yes.  Tactically no.

 

      The Comilla experience teaches us this essential lesson:

 

      Replicating a model entails replicating the role of the agency which has evolved the model.  The government or any project has no built-in capability to assume such role.  It will not be able, for instance, to anticipate the problems which can occur.  It has to develop trained manpower required by the model.

 

    1. On Institution-Building

The Comilla experience tends to validate our theory that a single-motive approach to building local institutions and organizing communities will not work.  Organizing farmers alone will not do.  Motivating people on the basis of economic needs alone will not sustain motivation and interest, and will not raise consciousness about organization discipline.  Imposing sanctions without the company motivation strategy will not insure the viability of local institutions.

 

    1. On the Target Group Approach

Equity in development is the current propelling force of criticism directed against many programs and projects.  The Comilla Model was an unwilling victim.  In the first place, when it was conceived, the primary interest was to shore up the sagging resources of small and medium farmers so that they could be credit-worthy and thereby mobilized to be a potent for agricultural development.  The interests of the landless and other marginal groups took secondary importance.  They were in the minority in the laboratory area and had understandably a lukewarm attitude to increased agricultural production on account of their relation to the means of production.  But in the resurgence of empathy and justifiable bias for the disadvantaged everybody forgot what Comilla intended to do at the beginning.  It was thus measured on a different value sale.

 

In our particular case, we have to take a hard look at our programs and projects and have the peace of conscience that in our absorption with the process which catalyzes such programs and projects we do not forget the traditionally unattended layer of the target population.

 

C.      Some observations Which May Be of Value in the Planning of the Prooposed Center

 

1.a.  The Academy at Comilla had everything going for it during its inception in 1959-

 

1)       Ford Foundation underwrote the construction of the buildings.

2)       Michigan University made its faculty staff available for consultation; it actively assisted in the recruitment and training of the initial staff.

3)       The government had policy and logistic support for the Academy.

4)       Dr. Ahmed Ackter khan enjoyed immense popularity among his former colleagues  in the Civil Service who were willing to help him fulfill the dream of a “crazy old man.”

5)       The Academy had the enviable posture of rising phoenix-like from the ashes of previous attempts to improve conditions in the rural areas.

 

b.       Except for a brief undertain period just after the 1971 war of Liberation, the government has always extended unwavering support to the Academy.  The volume of rhetoric heaped in praise of the Academy by high-ranking members of the national leadership will lead anyone to think that anything the institution recommends will be implemented by the ministries.

 

As it has turned out, there is always a wide gap between the rhetoric of support by high-ranking authorities and actual practice by various ministries.  On several critical occasions particular to the  replication of the Comilla Model, for instance, the recommendations of the Academy have been grossly ignored implementing agencies.

 

c.       The Academy earned attention, awe and admiration from the international community of scholars, rural development experts, politicians and statesmen, and donors.

 

It has earned for the country international recognition.

 

The laboratory area, the Comilla Kotwali Thana, has become virtual Mecca for researchers and visitors.  The conduct of research, particularly foreign-funded studies not directly related to the action programs of the Academy, as well as the influx itself of visitors in the villages, may have in themselves a variable in the experimentation.  Exposure to visitors may have hastened motivational work among villagers.  Or the presence itself of foreign technicians demonstrating methods, etc. may have speeded up adoption of technologies.

 

This variable is absent to a significant degree in areas where models evolved will be replicated. 

 

d.       The popularity of the Academy with the local intelligentsia has been eroded in recent years by criticisms leveled about the Comilla Model.

 

It has become fashionable for functionaries of pilot projects to justify their quest for more effective strategies by citing the failure of the Academy to reach disadvantaged groups.

 

Not frequently the Academy puts up a defensive instance to answer such criticisms.

This trend is likely to jeopardize the exercise of the Academy’s new mandate to evaluate pilot projects undertaken by NGO’s.

 

2.       As developed by the Academy, the Comilla Model had an intrinsic element the integration of services at government and external agency level.  Thus the Thana Training and Development Center provides an infrastructure support to effect such integration.  In locating offices of technical agencies at a particular geographic area, at least their physical distance will not hamper willingness to coordinate programs.  Some TTDC’s have housing quarters built to make probably that even in their sleep and all thru their nightmares at the Thana government functionaries will still think of functional coordination.

 

Service delivery still remains generally fragmented if not fractionized by corruption.

 

On this critical element, this task of evolving a well coordinated mechanism to effect integrated programming and delivery of services, on this issue which has preoccupied planners and project implementers the world over, the researchers of the Academy have been surprisingly detached.

 

The Academy has not deemed it wise to join the frantic race to arrive at the correct mix of policy support, political will, institutional framework, legal sanctions, incentive package, and sensitizing strategies to hammer into the heads of bureaucrats the need for cooperation, etc. to facilitate meaningful development.

                       

3.       To a significant degree much more than they will concede, most development projects in Bangladesh have been influenced by some strategies evolved by the Academy.

 

The technique of organizing communities according to occupational groupings has not been put to serious challenge by any pilot project.  Homogeneity of economic interests is aspired for in the organizational activities of practically all projects.  From the array of economic groups identified, each project selects its particular target groups.  Event eh few attempts to organize the community on the basis of sex and age groups is governed by the popular bias to reach such groups among the property-less and the disadvantaged. 

 

In the vocabulary of the Academy, such informal groups organized by other projects are “pre-cooperative groups.”  These groups may stay such due to the reluctance of other projects to link to the federated cooperatives.  In their view, the dominant social groups almost always capture the leadership in the federation and hence they are vested with the authority to decide on who get the most benefit – which is, more often than not, themselves. 

 

Thus the economic group technique gets entangled in a web of contradictions.  Aiming to be pertinent to the economic interests of each group, which leads to the formation of homogenous groups within the community, the technique results in further widening the cleavage of class privilege and power.

 

The organizational technique currently popular in Bangladesh may bear within itself the seed of its own futility.

 

4.       Despite its announced intention to dissociate itself as the implementor o the Comilla Model, The Academy remains prominently identified with it in the public mind.  Despite the 15-year period of its adoption by government in the whole Comilla district, the achievements are still being claimed unabashedly by the Academy as its own.

 

Such a lapse has had repercussions to the effort to court government ministries to adopt the IDP as its own.

 

5.       The malaise which seems to afflict the Academy’s current training programs has been traced to an enfeebled imagination applied to research and extension , rather than to any serious intellectual malady.

 

D.      Specific Recommendations

 

Note:  You are invited to help formulate the recommendations after you have gone through the entire report.

 

PART II:  BACKGROUND NOTES

 

A.      Bangladesh and Its Problems

 

Bangladesh is a young nation which grapples with age-old problems. 

Although born barely 11 years ago, the country and its people have had more than a thousand years of history.  The Bangladeshi, like the Filipino, is a mixture of many races.

 

He is also an unwilling heir to varied problems spawned by underdevelopment.

 

The country’s population, now placed at about 88 million in 55 thousand square miles of land, grows at an annual rate of 2.8%. 

 

More than 90% of the people live in rural villages.

 

Of the total rural population, about 51% (8.5 million households, 35 million people) are landless.

 

Farms one acre and less constitute 41% of total areas under cultivation.  Their share, however, in total landholding is only 6%.

 

Only 15% of the rural population own farms 5 acres or more, but they own 40% of the land.

 

More than 70% of the people are in absolute poverty, earning 1,000 Takas (P500) or less a year.

 

Of the total labor force of 23 million, around 30% are unemployed.  Majority of children 0 to 14 years old are malnourished. 

 

Infant mortality rate is 140-150 per 1,000 live births.  Literacy rate is 22.3%.

 

Life expectancy is 48 years.

 

B.      Agriculture

 

Three-quarters of the population are engaged in agriculture, which contributes 65% to the Gross Domestic Product.

 

The major crops raised during the rainy season from June to September are rice, jute and sugarcane.  Pulses, oil seeds, tobacco, and vegetables are grown during the dry winter season from November to May.

 

Wheat is bring grown in increasing quantity.

 

The monsoon, which brings an annual 100-inch rainfall, results in destructive floods.  Cyclones, drought, and tidal waves also occur.

 

Compared to other parts of the planet, Bangladesh seems to have more than the normal share of natural calamities.

 

C.      Rural Development

 

Bangladesh has 68,018 villages grouped into 4,350 Unions and included under 465 Thanas, the lowest administrative units.

 

A Thana has about 150 villages with a combined population of around 200,000.  Each village has around 100 to 400 well-knit households.

 

Prior to the 1950’s, previous attempts to improve conditions in the villages were largely prompted by emergency situations due to famine and other natural calamities.

 

After the famine in 1878, an Agriculture Department was set up by the British Administration with the twin function t improve agriculture and provide famine relief.

 

Shortly after the famine in 19000, the Agriculture Department was expanded to include research as additional function.

 

In 1904, village cooperatives were organized to provide credit for agricultural development.

 

Village development projects began to emerge in the 1920’s at the initiative of some members of the Indian Civil Service and Christian Missionaries.

 

As agitation against British rule spread to the villages in the 1930’s, the government funneled funds to the provincial governments.

 

In 1938, a separate rural reconstruction department was established in Bengal.  It was abolished in 1944 upon the recommendation of a committee which had the opinion that rural development should be the objective of all departments, rather than the sole responsibility of a separate unit.

 

In 1947, the British Government divided Bengal into two parts:  West Bengl was made a province of India, and East Pakistan, a province of Pakistan.

 

In East Pakistan, which became Bangladesh in 1971, little attention was paid to the rural areas between 1948 and 1952.

 

After the food shortage in 1952, the government introduced the Japanese method of rice cultivation.  Demonstration farms were established.  Rewards for best farmers were given.

 

The government also released funds to local bodies for minor irrigation projects, which basically consisted of digging small canals.

 

D.      Village Agricultural and Industrial Development Program

 

In 1952, the Government of Pakistan organized a five-member committee to formulate a suitable scheme for rural development.

 

The group went to the United States to study the organization, philosophy, and techniques of extension work.

 

On the Basis of the committee’s recommendation, the Village Agricultural and Industrial Development (V-AID) program was launched in 1953 as the first comprehensive program for rural development.  It was financed by the International Cooperation Administration.

 

The program featured the deployment of multipurpose worker who would coordinate the work of technical departments at village level and become in effect their extension agent.

 

The V-AID program generally proved ineffective.

 

The reasons given are as follows: a) the village level worker did not possess adequate knowledge of the technical services he was supposed to deliver; b)  he was perceived as an intruder by the villagers; c) the V-AID organization was considered a separate department and thus failed to get the full cooperation of other departments;  d) lack of funds and training facilities; and e) instability of central and provincial governments.

 

The program was abolished in 1962.

 

E.      The Academy at Comilla

 

As early as 1956, the Government felt the need to establish training institutes for rural development workers, government policy makers and planners, and technical experts.

 

In 1958, two such institutes were established – one at Comillain East Pakistan and the other at Peshawar in West Pakistan.

 

The ford Foundation and Michigan State University provided assistance in setting up the institutes.  The instructors were recruited and sent to Michigan State University for training in 1958.

 

The institute at Comilla started operations in May, 1959 and was known as the East Pakistan Academy for Village Development, which was later chaged to Pakistan Academy for Rural Development.

 

In 1971, when Bangladesh became a separate sovereign state, the institution was renamed Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development (BARD).

 

Basic Objective.  The basic objective of the Academy is to evolve rural development approaches which can be recommended to Government for nation-wide replication.

 

The Academy uses the entire Comilla Kotwali Thana (107 sq. miles) as its social laboratory for research and experimental projects.

 

Training.  The Academy trains a wide range of clientele-

 

v      farmers

v      village leaders

v      personnel of technical agencies

v      administrators

v      planners

v      academicians

v      teachers and students

v      workers of non-government organizations

 

The Academy trains an average of 3,000 to 4,000 people a year.  As of 1979, over a span of 20 years, more than 60,000 people have been trained at Comilla.

 

A number of foreign countries have sent trainees to the Academy including the Philippines, Nepal, Sweden, United States, Laos, Australia, USSR, Japan, Iran, Turkey, etc.  In addition, post-graduate students from foreign universities come to the Academy to conduct thesis work.

 

The subject matter areas covered in training courses include the following with varying emphasis according t need –

 

v      Rural Administration

v      Rural Economics

v      Rural Sociology, Social psychology, and communication

v      Cooperatives and Rural Business Management

v      Agricultural Research and Extension

v      Rural Education

v      Public Health, Family Planning, and Women’s Education

v      Irrigation and Mechanization

v      Community Organization

v      Accounts and Audits

v      Planning and Coordination for Development

 

The faculty staff directly handle the training  of Thana-level officers, who in turn serve as trainors of village-level organizations.

 

Training for each clientele generally consists of

v      Classroom discussions

v      Library studies

v      Field visits

v      Study of research findings or case studies

 

The curriculum is constantly enriched by experiences drawn from action research and regular contacts with villagers in the social laboratory area.

 

Researches.  The researches undertaken by the Academy fall under two categories-

 

v      Survey research

v      Evaluation studies

 

Thru survey research, socio-economic data are collected for the purpose of planning developmental projects.

 

Evaluation studies are carried out either independently or jointly with other institutions to monitor and assess various projects of the Academy and those undertaken by other agencies outside Comilla.

 

During the last 20 years, the Academy has established collaborative links for research work with Michigan State University; Harvard University; World Population Council; UN Research Institute for Social Development; Baath University; ASARRD/FAO; University of Goettingen and Upsala; Asian and Pacific Development Administration Center.

 

More than 40 books and articles by national and foreign scholars have dealt with various aspects of the Academy’s work at Comilla.

 

Faculty.  The faculty staff is composed of

v      Director

v      Deputy Directors

v      Instructors

v      Associate Instructors

v      Assistant Instructors

v      Librarian

 

The total staff number 31, most of whom have advanced degrees acquired from foreign universities.

 

Facilities.  The campus area covers 156 acres (__ has.), of  which 10 acres (__ has.) are used by the Cooperative College.

 

The Academy has

 

v      A two-story library building with over 29,000 titles available

v      An auditorium with space to seat about 250 persons

v      A cafeteria which can accommodate 300 persons for meals at a time

v      A Guest House

v      3 hostels

v      Bank

v      Post Office

v      Telegraph Office

v      Clinic

v      Cooperative Store

v      Barber Shop

 

F.      The Comilla Model

 

During the first five years (1960-1965) of experimentation at the comilla Kotwali Thana, the Academy evolved what is known world-wide as the “ comilla Model” or the “ Comilla Approach,” which is essentially a multi-pronged strategy to increase agricultural production.

 

Its basic components are as follows:

 

Two-tier Cooperative System.  At the village level, cooperatives are formed among farmers and non-farmers.  Each cooperative draws up production plans; applies for supervised credit; disburses loans from the Thana-level association; collects repayment; generate thrift deposits from members; and formulates decisions on matters presented during weekly meetings.

 

Thana Training and Development Center 9TTDC).  Thru the center, the offices, services, and commodities of technical agencies, as well as of the Cooperatives Association, the Thana Council, and other entities are located in a particular geographic area.  The TTDC facilitates coordination among government agencies and between the government and the cooperatives.  It provides cooperatives easy access to services and commodities from the government and external agencies.

 

Rural Works Program (RWP).  This program builds the physical infrastructure for agricultural development:  roads and bridges primarily for marketing farm produce, embankments, drainage canals, and culverts for flood control; and irrigation canals to protect crops from drought.

 

It also provides jobs to the unemployed in the rural areas.

 

Thana Irrigation Program (TIP).  This program expands the RWP thru creation of water reservoir, canals, sluices, regulators; use of drilling rigs; tube-well sinking.  High- yielding varieties are introduced in irrigated areas.

 

Like the RWP, it also creates jobs for the unemployed in the villages.

 

As developed by the Academy, these four basic components of the Comilla Model are mutually interdependent.

 

The two-tier cooperative system organizes the people and protectsthem from money-lenders.  It helps accumulate capital and facilitates pumping of credit and other to the rural areas.

 

Both the Rural Works Program and the Thana Irrigation Program develop land water resources thus increasing productive capability.

 

The Thana Training and Development Center coordinates the flow of services and commodities and provide training to farmers and other rural clientele.

           

G.     Major Achievements

 

The following have been cited as major achievements of the Academy –

 

In its laboratory area, the Academy has increased rice production four times, turning a deficit area into a surplus area.

 

Per capita farm income showed a 172% increase between 1963 and 1970.

 

An additional annual labor demand of about 10 thousand man-years has been created at the Comilla Kotwali Thana.

 

All four programs experimented as components of the Comilla model have been launched nation-wide by the government.

 

Before the TTDC was tested as concept by the Academy, the Thana was nothing but a police station and a place for collecting taxes.  Now every Thana is a focal point for development efforts.

 

Before the TIP was experimented on by the Academy, mass-scale mechanized irrigation was unknown to the Bengali farmer.  Now it is a national program.

 

The same could be said of the Rural Works program.

 

In 1970, the government launched the Integrated Rural Development program (IRDP) to replicate the Comilla Model all over Bangladesh.  How the IRDP is an institutionalized program in more than 50% of the Thanas.

 

H.      Innovative Strategies

 

New Extension System.  In the past, government extension workers were ineffective.  They had no local organizations to rely on.  The villagers regarded them with suspicion.  The flow of information, guidance and supplies was not sustained by the extension system.

 

In its work with cooperatives, the Academy evolved the Model Farmer concept.  Each cooperative selects its most progressive farmer.  The Model Farmer and the Manager of the cooperative attend weekly meetings and classes either at the Academy or the TTDC.  They relay to the village the ideas and commodities acquired.

 

In effect, they serve as the new extension agents.

 

Social Services.  The Academy has been devoting increased attention to action research in the social sector:  rural education; health and nutrition; and women, youth, and child development.  Some strategies developed in these fields have been adopted by several ministries.

 

Participation of the Landless.  An experiment to test approaches to generating the participation of the landless in village development is being undertaken by the Academy in cooperation with the Asian Survey on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ASARRD).  Preliminary results are considered encouraging.

 

Total Village Development.   This model was tested during the last five years in several villages.  Projected for expansion within the year, it seeks to organize all villagers 9 years old and above under a single institutional framework, most probably the Village Cooperative Society.